How the calculator estimates calories
Every activity in the list has a MET value, short for metabolic equivalent of task. One MET is the energy you use sitting quietly, roughly 1 kcal per kilogram of body weight per hour. An activity rated 8 METs costs about eight times that.
The values come from the Compendium of Physical Activities, a reference maintained by exercise scientists that pulls together measured energy costs for hundreds of activities. It is the same source behind most fitness apps and research questionnaires.
Using the calculator
Choose the activity closest to what you did, enter your body weight and the number of minutes you were actually moving. For lifting, that is the length of the session. For intervals, use the whole session including recoveries, because the MET value for circuit training already accounts for them.
Heavier people burn more for the same activity because they move more mass, so keep your weight current. If two activities are close, pick the lower one. You will rarely regret underestimating.
The formula
Calories (kcal) = MET × body weight (kg) × duration (hours)
Example: a 75 kg person running at 10 km/h (9.8 METs) for 30 minutes burns about 9.8 × 75 × 0.5 = 368 kcal.
The same person lifting at a general pace (3.5 METs) for an hour burns about 263 kcal. That surprises a lot of people: lifting builds muscle and strength, but as a calorie burner it is modest.
MET values used
| Activity | MET | kcal / 30 min at 70 kg |
|---|---|---|
| Weight lifting, general | 3.5 | 123 |
| Weight lifting, vigorous | 6.0 | 210 |
| Circuit training / HIIT | 8.0 | 280 |
| Walking, 5 km/h | 3.5 | 123 |
| Brisk walking, 6.4 km/h | 5.0 | 175 |
| Running, 8 km/h | 8.3 | 291 |
| Running, 10 km/h | 9.8 | 343 |
| Running, 12 km/h | 11.8 | 413 |
| Cycling, 16-19 km/h | 6.8 | 238 |
| Cycling, 20-22 km/h | 8.0 | 280 |
| Swimming, moderate | 5.8 | 203 |
| Rowing machine, moderate | 7.0 | 245 |
| Elliptical, moderate | 5.0 | 175 |
| Stair climber | 9.0 | 315 |
| Jump rope | 12.3 | 431 |
| Yoga | 2.5 | 88 |
| Hiking | 6.0 | 210 |
| Dancing | 5.0 | 175 |
| Basketball | 6.5 | 228 |
| Football / soccer | 7.0 | 245 |
Everyday movement matters more than you think
Formal exercise is only one part of the calories you burn. The rest, called non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT), covers walking, standing, fidgeting, housework and everything else you do outside the gym. Research by James Levine and colleagues showed that NEAT can differ by hundreds of calories a day between people of similar size.
That has a practical consequence. A one-hour gym session at 3.5-6 METs might burn 250-450 kcal. Adding 5,000 extra steps over the day, roughly 45-50 minutes of normal walking, burns a similar amount for most people, and costs far less recovery.
| Daily habit | Approx. extra kcal (70 kg) |
|---|---|
| 5,000 extra steps | 200-250 |
| 30 min brisk walk | 175 |
| 1 hour standing instead of sitting | 40-60 |
| Taking stairs, 10 minutes total | 100-150 |
NEAT also tends to drop when you diet. People move less without noticing when food is low, which is one of the main reasons weight loss slows. Tracking a daily step count is a simple way to keep it steady. Many people find 8,000-10,000 steps a realistic target that makes a calorie deficit noticeably easier to hold.
Gross vs net calories
The formula gives gross calories: everything you burned during the session, including the roughly 1 MET you would have burned sitting on the sofa anyway. The extra calories caused by the exercise, the net figure, are about MET minus 1.
For a long, easy walk that difference is a big share of the total. For a hard run it is small. If you add exercise calories back into a diet, the net figure is the more honest one, and your TDEE may already include your usual training through the activity multiplier, so be careful not to count it twice.
Why your watch says something different
Fitness trackers and gym machines often report higher numbers than this calculator. Independent tests of wrist wearables have found energy expenditure errors commonly in the 20-40% range or more, even when heart rate is measured well, and cardio machines often assume a default body weight.
Neither source is exact. Individual fitness, technique, terrain and how hard you actually pushed all change the real cost. Use these numbers to compare activities and plan your week, not to justify an extra dessert.
If weight loss is the goal, do not eat back all your exercise calories. Adding back half is a safer rule of thumb, then adjust based on what the scale does over three or four weeks.
Putting the number to use
Exercise helps with fat loss, but diet sets the pace. A 30-minute run might burn 300-400 kcal, about the same as one large coffee drink and a pastry. Set your intake with the calorie calculator and use training to build fitness and keep muscle.
For a plan that combines both, see the fat loss workout plan and the guide to calculating calories for weight loss.
Frequently asked questions
How many calories does lifting weights burn?
A general lifting session is around 3.5 METs, so a 70 kg person burns about 245 kcal per hour. A fast-paced, vigorous session is closer to 6 METs, or about 420 kcal per hour.
Does lifting burn calories after the workout?
Yes, a little. Excess post-exercise oxygen consumption adds a modest amount, usually tens of calories rather than hundreds. The main long-term benefit is preserving and building muscle.
Are fitness tracker calorie counts accurate?
Not very. Studies of wrist wearables regularly find energy errors of 20% or more. They are useful for tracking trends but should not be treated as exact.
Why do heavier people burn more calories?
Moving a heavier body takes more energy, so the formula multiplies by body weight. As you lose weight, the same workout burns fewer calories, which is one reason fat loss slows over time.
Should I eat back the calories I burn exercising?
If your calorie target already includes an activity multiplier, no. If it is based on a sedentary level, adding back about half of the estimated exercise calories is a sensible starting point.
References
- Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011.
- Shcherbina A, Mattsson CM, Waggott D, et al. Accuracy in wrist-worn, sensor-based measurements of heart rate and energy expenditure in a diverse cohort. J Pers Med. 2017.
Results are estimates for healthy adults and are not medical advice. See our medical disclaimer.



